Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Maddison Inglis vs Haruna Arakawa Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Inglis vs Arakawa analysis and find out who is favored!
Maddison Inglis vs Haruna Arakawa Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Inglis 4 - 0 Arakawa
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Inglis has won 47.01% of points on their second serve, while Arakawa has won 47.06%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Inglis, in recent form, has won 55.66% of their opponent's second serve points, while Arakawa has won 59.6%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.99% and 44.44% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Inglis has saved 56.02% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Arakawa has saved 55.67% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Inglis has won 57.14% of matches played (W/L 32/ 24), with Arakawa winning 55.36% (W/L 31/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Inglis has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 62% (W/L 31/ 19), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Arakawa has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 65% (W/L 11/ 6), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Inglis has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.42% of matches (W/L 29/ 19), where as Arakawa has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.32% of matches (W/L 26/ 21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Inglis winning 4 times and Arakawa being victorious 0 times. They have played 9 sets in total, with Inglis winning 8 and Arakawa winning 1. The last match between Inglis and Arakawa was at the W25 Toowoomba, 12-10-2019, Semifinals, Hard with Maddison Inglis getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:53:15.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Inglis and Arakawa have played a deciding set 1 times, with Inglis winning 1 times and Arakawa 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Inglis winning 1, and Arakawa 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Inglis has played against opponents with an average rank of 306.66 while Arakawa has played against players with an average rank of 211.3.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Inglis has won 42% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Arakawa has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Inglis has converted 46.86% of breakpoint opportunities, and Arakawa has converted 57.59% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
237
Rank
112
High
26
Age
R
Plays
4
Total0
3
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
450
Rank
352
High
24
Age
Plays
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
59% (251-176)
Career Total W/L
52% (198-185)
65% (20-11)
YTD W/L
58% (15-11)
$423,460
Career Prize Money
$0
2
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Maddison Inglis | Haruna Arakawa |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 4 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 8 | 1 |
| Games Won | 53 | 27 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 13 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:53:15 | 1:53:15 |
| 1st Serve % | 73% (178/243) | 70% (194/278) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 66% (118/178) | 45% (88/194) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 38% (25/65) | 45% (38/84) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (25/44) | 46% (12/26) |
| Return Points W% | 55% (152/278) | 41% (100/243) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (4/4) | 0% (0/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (3/3) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (3/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (3/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-2 |
Stats 
Maddison Inglis
Player
Haruna Arakawa
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
79%
(
33 of
42)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
0
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
||||
| 6-4 6-0 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Haruna Arakawa
85%
(
45 of
53)
1st Serve %
69%
(
45 of
65)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
22 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
38 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
||||
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Haruna Arakawa
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
21%
(
3 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
47%
(
24 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
| 4-6 7-6(4) 6-3 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Haruna Arakawa
69%
(
60 of
87)
1st Serve %
68%
(
79 of
117)
2
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
4
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
44 of
79)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
39%
(
34 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
54 of
117)
107
Total Points Won
97
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Maddison Inglis | Haruna Arakawa |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 65% (20/11) | 58% (15/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 62% (47/29) | 60% (34/23) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (398/322) | 56% (295/234) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 63% (12/7) | 57% (12/9) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 60% (3/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 78% (7/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.29 | 0.06 |
| Aces Total | 101 | 15 |
| DFs per game | 0.41 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 142 | 61 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:54:28 | 1:35:53 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 308.42 | 196.77 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (1359/2229) | 66% (991/1501) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (897/1359) | 58% (571/991) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (409/870) | 47% (240/510) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (142/303) | 58% (110/191) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (1121/2425) | 50% (690/1382) |
| Slam W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 69% (18/8) | 59% (13/9) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 65% (20/31) | 63% (15/24) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 20% (1/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (7/14) | 43% (3/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 79% (19/15) | 81% (16/13) |
| 1st set W, L | 21% (19/4) | 19% (16/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 42% (12/5) | 20% (10/2) |
Maddison Inglis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Maddison Inglis
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Aoi Ito
Player
Maddison Inglis
65%
(
74 of
114)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
89)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
59%
(
44 of
74)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
46%
(
53 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
89)
101
Total Points Won
102
|
4-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Zongyu Li
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve %
77%
(
67 of
87)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
23 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
87)
90
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Han Shi
69%
(
67 of
97)
1st Serve %
74%
(
89 of
120)
1
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
7
57%
(
38 of
67)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
48 of
89)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
46%
(
45 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
60 of
120)
112
Total Points Won
105
|
5-7 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Miho Kuramochi
Player
Maddison Inglis
75%
(
79 of
106)
1st Serve %
58%
(
62 of
107)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
8
62%
(
49 of
79)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
43%
(
46 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
51 of
107)
111
Total Points Won
102
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Mayuka Aikawa
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
79%
(
53 of
67)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
21%
(
5 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
50%
(
9 of
18)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
52%
(
33 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
43 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yexin Ma
Player
Maddison Inglis
58%
(
76 of
130)
1st Serve %
61%
(
74 of
121)
1
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
13
68%
(
52 of
76)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
48 of
74)
31%
(
17 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
16 of
47)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
47%
(
61 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
57 of
121)
126
Total Points Won
125
|
4-6 7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Moyuka Uchijima
Player
Maddison Inglis
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
12
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Stacey Fung
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Ena Shibahara
54%
(
56 of
103)
1st Serve %
61%
(
63 of
104)
4
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
0
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
38%
(
18 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
46%
(
47 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
50 of
104)
106
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Haruna Arakawa Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Dayeon Back
Player
Haruna Arakawa
68%
(
63 of
92)
1st Serve %
64%
(
65 of
102)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
7
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
40 of
65)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
40 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
44 of
102)
96
Total Points Won
98
|
7-5 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Haruna Arakawa
Player
Peangtarn Plipuech
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
65
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Petra Hule
Player
Haruna Arakawa
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve %
57%
(
26 of
46)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
16 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Haruna Arakawa
Player
Shrivalli Rashmikaa Bhamidipaty
64%
(
63 of
99)
1st Serve %
48%
(
33 of
69)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
43%
(
43 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
88
Total Points Won
80
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Haruna Arakawa
Player
Hyoseon Kim
50%
(
16 of
32)
1st Serve %
59%
(
19 of
32)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
75%
(
12 of
16)
1st Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
8 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
78%
(
25 of
32)
49
Total Points Won
15
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Haruna Arakawa
Player
I-Hsuan Cho
48%
(
26 of
54)
1st Serve %
45%
(
29 of
64)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
8
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
50%
(
27 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
39 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Vaidehi Chaudhari
Player
Haruna Arakawa
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
72%
(
55 of
76)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
45%
(
31 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Haruna Arakawa
Player
Ui Su Jeong
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
41%
(
34 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Inglis Vs Arakawa Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Inglis are available here and Arakawa photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
